A good lead waits.
Context sits in one tool while follow-up waits in another. Response time slips before anyone notices.
Bring one workflow that keeps stalling, coming back, or losing an owner. We find the break worth fixing before you spend on automation.
A good lead waits, a usable draft returns, or an issue reaches everyone except an owner.
Context sits in one tool while follow-up waits in another. Response time slips before anyone notices.
The request, source material, and approval standard arrive separately. Review becomes another round of reconstruction.
The alert exists, but the decision and escalation path do not. Everyone sees it; nobody is accountable.
Representative route: research a buying signal, score customer fit, pause unclear evidence, then update CRM and alert the assigned rep. Failed updates retry and alert the owner.
The signal matches the agreed customer-fit rules
Account context and customer-fit score reach the assigned rep in CRM.
An ambiguous score waits for a person before outreach begins.
A failed CRM update retries, then alerts the workflow owner.
Four stages leave your team with a workflow map, agreed build route, review and recovery rules, and a before-and-after measurement plan.
Plan a workflow reviewTrace the people, tools, delays, exceptions, and rework. Agree one workflow owner, one baseline, and one primary outcome.
Inputs, integrations, decision rules, retries, and the final destination go into one written scope.
Ambiguous or high-consequence work pauses for a named reviewer. Failures retry, alert, and route to the agreed manual fallback.
Baseline, throughput, failures, corrections, cost per run, and the primary business outcome are agreed before launch.
You control production accounts. Client data is not used to train AI models. We hand over the workflow, code, configuration, prompts, documentation, and runbook.
Each phase stands on its own. You inspect the work, decide whether to continue, and pay only for the phase you approve.
Three separate decisions: diagnose the workflow, build the agreed automation, then add ongoing care only if it is useful.
Leave with a decision-ready plan.
Ship one agreed automation for a defined workflow against written acceptance criteria.
Keep one live workflow healthy and improve it deliberately.
It fixes the workflow, outcome, scope, and stop decision before build money is at risk. It is a separate engagement, not a credit toward the Build. You keep the map, baseline, ROI case, and action plan even if you stop there.
No. Launch includes 14 days of support. The monthly retainer is optional, and the handover is designed for operation without it.
Your team owns the delivered workflow, code, configuration, prompts, documentation, runbook, and client data. Production accounts stay under your control.
The written scope names retry behavior, owner alerts, and the manual fallback. High-consequence or ambiguous work pauses for a person.
Yes. The first question is whether the workflow should be repaired, simplified, or replaced. AfterMachines is not tied to one automation tool.
Usually not. We begin inside the tools your team already uses, then change only what the agreed workflow requires.
When a rule can handle the work reliably. AI is reserved for variable inputs that need analysis; deterministic steps remain deterministic.
Yes. AfterMachines is US-first and available worldwide. Access, working hours, and review timing are agreed before work begins.
AfterMachines is an AI workflow automation consultancy for B2B, agency, and service teams. It diagnoses one costly workflow, builds the agreed automation, and hands over a client-owned system.
Before the free 30-minute review, note where work starts, stalls, and needs a decision. You leave with a fit decision and recommended next step.
CHOOSE A WORKFLOW TO BRING